|
|
Post by tom on Dec 14, 2005 10:03:07 GMT -5
its just a t-shirt rob, get over it. I also have a george bush, wanted dead or alive t-shirt, i'll have to remind myself not to wear that, or my i hate maggie thatcher one too
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 14, 2005 10:05:04 GMT -5
Still not the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by shelli on Dec 14, 2005 10:05:07 GMT -5
Comparing cocaine to wearing a t-shirt that offends is just as ridiculous as comparing spongebob to the IRA.
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 14, 2005 10:06:40 GMT -5
I didn't compare wearing a shirt to cocaine. I suggested that buying a t-shirt in Fibbers does not make it's message okay, the same way that buying cocaine in Fibbers doesn't make it okay.
|
|
|
|
Post by shelli on Dec 14, 2005 10:11:50 GMT -5
Fair enough.
At the end of this discussion will Tom stop wearing the t-shirt though, not a hope, makes it a kinda pointless discussion really.
|
|
|
|
Post by peaches on Dec 14, 2005 10:13:05 GMT -5
let's all have a group hug and make nice with the other kiddies?!
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 14, 2005 10:25:59 GMT -5
with the loyalist, you must be jokin!
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 14, 2005 10:27:01 GMT -5
Tom can wear what he wants, but if it offends someone he can't expect them not to comment on it.
It's his freedom to wear what he wants, but it's my freedom to call him on it, just as anyone has the right to call me on stuff. This isn't just a case of hiding behind the keyboard interweb abuse either, because I said it to his face on Saturday.
I don't mean to offend you or your sensibilities Tom, I just think your shirt is retarded.
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 14, 2005 11:13:28 GMT -5
ah robb, you couldn't do that... i ain't got none!
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 14, 2005 11:52:17 GMT -5
if anyone slagged a shirt i wore i'd tell them to fuck off and find something worthwhile to get bothered about.
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 14, 2005 12:12:48 GMT -5
Taken on board, and duly ignored.
|
|
|
|
Post by peaches on Dec 14, 2005 12:14:18 GMT -5
OHHH, now I see the Robb/Dana divide
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 14, 2005 12:19:51 GMT -5
if it was taken on board, then it wasnt ignored.
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 14, 2005 12:31:18 GMT -5
In order for me to adequately ignore your timely contribution, I first had to evaluate it. As such, what first seems like an inherintly contradictory statement makes solid sense.
QED.
Arthur says what now?
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 14, 2005 12:37:22 GMT -5
erm..... yeah.... thats exactly what i was about to say........
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 14, 2005 12:48:22 GMT -5
 It's been a long hard day. You shall have to excuse me. |
|
