|
Post by dana on Dec 15, 2005 7:46:05 GMT -5
well im sorry if i find 'yay, look at me!' threads a bit vain.
|
|
|
Post by C a r l a on Dec 15, 2005 7:47:24 GMT -5
i remember awhile back you talking about the fact that you had three thread names dedicated to u...?
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 15, 2005 7:48:05 GMT -5
in a post, not a thread! jesus christ how many times does this need explained?
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 15, 2005 7:52:43 GMT -5
I disagree Dana. After all, until it degenerated into the regular babble, and you started on with your nonsense, Fueys topic started a pretty healthy discussion about job searches and so forth.
You just seem to want everything to be done your way. That's just not going to happen.
Besides the fact that a bunch of us had all wished her luck in her job search, and so when she came back and had the job, I was only too pleased to see her post that she got it.
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 15, 2005 7:53:08 GMT -5
are you guys havin a chat again?
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 15, 2005 7:54:52 GMT -5
no Tom, just another one of his attempts to seem intellectual and condescending.
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 15, 2005 7:59:04 GMT -5
Wah ha ha ha. What exactly was condescending about my last post?
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 15, 2005 8:01:38 GMT -5
You just seem to want everything to be done your way. That's just not going to happen. there you go.
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 15, 2005 8:07:18 GMT -5
I suppose you could read it like that. I personally wouldn't have. I do like how one of the primary definitions of condescend is to descend to the level of one considered inferior; lower oneself. Seeing as I didn't think I was being condescending and you did, does that mean you consider yourself inferior to me? Don't forget... www.samaritans.org
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 15, 2005 8:37:28 GMT -5
cheers rob. Dana you may consider it vain to start a thread about your personal life,but i for one like to know how people are getting on even if i dont know them myself its nice to know that someone who was having a shitty time isnt anymore it brightens my day to think the world isnt such a shitty place after all.
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 15, 2005 8:39:38 GMT -5
it helps the pass by quicker, to know others peoples lives are as boring as your own!
|
|
|
Post by meetzemonstaz on Dec 15, 2005 13:20:07 GMT -5
no Tom, just another one of his attempts to seem intellectual and condescending. He is intellectual and condescending. Well, maybe not condescending. Sarcastic, but only towards those who deserve it. ;D As far as I read Robb, if you're doing wrong, he'll call you on it. As for not labelling a thead after something personal, ok, let's have a million more about Dimebag or fuckin' sweets of some description. A wise man once said they all dissolve into twat anyway. *no offence to Dimebag or Cadbury there. Nestle can go fuck 'emselves*
|
|
|
Post by Helmut on Dec 15, 2005 13:37:16 GMT -5
Imagine a Chocolate Dimebag Statue.
|
|
fuey
Junior Member
More Spare Camels Than A Shiek
Posts: 124
|
Post by fuey on Dec 15, 2005 13:44:29 GMT -5
a chocolate dimebag statue? that sounds a little delicious
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 15, 2005 13:54:44 GMT -5
Almost as delicious as a chocolate Chris Walken statue.
|
|
fuey
Junior Member
More Spare Camels Than A Shiek
Posts: 124
|
Post by fuey on Dec 15, 2005 14:05:24 GMT -5
that would be scarily, awesomely delicious
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 16, 2005 3:48:53 GMT -5
A Choclate Heidi Klum statue with a caramel filling, with no nuts!
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 16, 2005 3:51:41 GMT -5
He is intellectual and condescending. Well, maybe not condescending. Sarcastic, but only towards those who deserve it.[/quote]
Do you make horoscopes or something in your spare time?
|
|
|
Post by Drummo on Dec 16, 2005 4:01:57 GMT -5
A chocolate Scarlet Johanson!!! I'd look after the filling myself
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 16, 2005 4:20:56 GMT -5
That'd probably look tasty, but I wouldn't be so keen on eating it.
|
|