|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 9:12:38 GMT -5
No it doesnt make it better he didnt say his full name the fact is the more that persons name is mentioned then the harder it will be for people who were deeply sadded by such a completly unprovoked and hideous murder to forget.
I never said i was a great fan of yoko ono myself infact what she said about Johns murderer could have been the only decent thing she ever said.
Fair play Deschain i couldnt have said better myself
|
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 9:16:37 GMT -5
She didnt take his life Tom he did.
I dont care what Yoko Ono done or does for fame.
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 9, 2005 9:17:50 GMT -5
No, she didn't, but she ruined it!
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 9, 2005 9:21:27 GMT -5
im setting myself up for a killing here, but....... many said that the best thing john lennon done for the beatles was get assassinated (dont kill me, please, PLEASE!)
|
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 9:22:46 GMT -5
Thats your opinion im sure in his own she was the love of his life and they were extremely happy together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drummo on Dec 9, 2005 9:24:16 GMT -5
im setting myself up for a killing here, but....... many said that the best thing john lennon done for the beatles was get assassinated (dont kill me, please, PLEASE!) Hee hee hee ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 9:37:14 GMT -5
What!!!! oh god why do i bother!!!
Maybe the best thing John Lennon did for the Beatles Dana was be apart of the group and write their songs.
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 9, 2005 9:39:17 GMT -5
maybe. speaking of assassinations, am i the only one who wishes that someone would get Bono over and done with?
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 9, 2005 9:39:59 GMT -5
Paul McCartney would be the first to disagree with you there Emma
|
|
|
|
Post by xrobbedgex on Dec 9, 2005 9:41:05 GMT -5
Ha ha ha ha ha. He is due one, but he's already a martyr for the cult of iPod, so I think I'd save the bullet for someone more useful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 9:47:53 GMT -5
No Tom i dont think he would be to be honest they were a team and they worked best together The Beatles wouldnt have been half as good without either of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 9, 2005 10:16:44 GMT -5
I'm talking about the fact that marrying Yoko Ono ruined John Lennons life
|
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 10:26:00 GMT -5
oh right sorry.
Maybe she did but he was a willing partisipant.
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 9, 2005 10:29:57 GMT -5
its shit when you see someone brought down by their other half, isnt it. man, i've seen that happen countless times
|
|
deschain
Newbie
Self Confessed Musical Encyclopedia.... .... yeah.
Posts: 7
|
Post by deschain on Dec 9, 2005 10:30:53 GMT -5
Sorry to disappoint you Tom, but no my post was not ‘goggled‘. My brain just happens to be a musical encyclopaedia, I know what I’m talking about and I don’t feed the need to run off and search the internet when I need to stress a point. Perhaps that’s your way of doing things, but not mine. Oh and The Beatles can‘t sing? Get your ears checked tom because I don‘t thinking they are working.
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 9, 2005 10:34:28 GMT -5
do me a favour and read my posts! I said they wern't great singers, they were ok, good, decent, but not great
|
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 9, 2005 10:35:29 GMT -5
maybe he thinks they cant, thats not for you to decide. and if you'd any manners you wouldnt even comment in the fashion which you did.
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Dec 9, 2005 10:35:43 GMT -5
oh right sorry. Maybe she did but he was a willing partisipant. thats cause he was stoned all the time |
|
|
|
Post by dana on Dec 9, 2005 10:47:16 GMT -5
what drugs was he on? he wasnt a junkie was he?
|
|
|
|
Post by Emma on Dec 9, 2005 10:52:34 GMT -5
Tom im sure you have been stoned many a time.
I know from experience that being stoned would not be enough for someone to be able to control me.
He married the women for gods sake!!!!
|
|
